The most successful beauty and wellness brands aren't competing on products anymore. They're competing on understanding.

In this blog:

💛 How brands are shifting from selling products to understanding people
💛 The three layers of brand intelligence (and where most brands get stuck)
💛 Practical ways to build smarter systems without losing your soul

Quick favour: If this resonates, subscribe to this new, growing community where we explore how to build brands through deeper connection, not louder marketing.

Let's rewind for a second.

Brands used to be simple: a logo, a promise, maybe a catchy tagline. You made a good product, you told people about it, and they bought it. Done.

But something fundamental has changed in how people relate to the brands they choose.

We used to buy products.

Now we buy mirrors - reflections of who we are or who we're becoming.

Think about it:

This shift created a new challenge: How do you reflect someone's identity when you have millions of customers?

The answer? You get smarter. A lot smarter.

Here's where it gets interesting.

Smart brands aren't just collecting data; everyone's doing that. Smart brands are reading between the lines, finding patterns in behaviour that customers themselves haven't noticed.

When L'Oréal bought ModiFace, most people thought it was about virtual try-on. Cute tech feature, right?

Wrong.

It was about transforming your phone into a crystal ball. When you test different makeup looks, the app isn't just showing you products; it's learning your aesthetic preferences, your colour affinities, even the time of day you experiment with bolder looks versus natural ones.

That information doesn't just sell you lipstick. It shapes how the brand talks to you, what they recommend next, and which communities they connect you with.

The mirror stopped reflecting what it is. It started showing what could be.

Nike Training Club doesn't just give you workouts. It notices when you're skipping leg day (again). When you're consistently choosing shorter sessions. When you're searching for recovery content instead of high-intensity intervals.

And instead of guilt-tripping you, it adjusts. Suggests gentler movements. Offers rest day routines. Sends you content about listening to your body.

It's not just tracking your fitness. It's tracking your relationship with fitness, and responding accordingly.

HelloFresh realised something fascinating: people don't just want food delivered. They want to be understood.

Their system notices patterns most of us don't see in ourselves. That you order comfort food on Mondays. That you're more adventurous with cuisine on weekends. That's when you skip a week; you usually come back craving something specific.

They're not mind-readers. They're pattern-readers. And in a world where we're all exhausted from making decisions, having a brand that just gets it feels like magic.

As I've studied brands making this shift, I've noticed they operate on three distinct levels:

What they see: Behaviour, preferences, patterns

What they do: Recommend, personalise, optimise

This is where most brands stop. They track what you click, what you buy, what you skip. Then they serve you more of what you liked.

It's useful. But it's not intelligence, it's just memory.

What they see: Signals, context, changes

What they do: Predict needs, adjust messaging, prevent problems

This is where it gets interesting. Brands at this level notice the subtle shifts, browsing behaviour changes, engagement patterns, even timing of interactions.

A skincare brand notices you're suddenly researching barrier repair. They don't wait for you to ask, they proactively share content about protecting compromised skin, before the problem escalates.

What they see: Aspirations, blockers, journey arcs

What they do: Partner, guide, evolve with you

This is the frontier. Brands at this level aren't just responding to what you do. They're understanding where you're trying to go, and helping you get there.

Under Armour's fitness platform doesn't just track your runs. It notices you're training inconsistently, correlates it with your sleep data, and suggests adjustments to your routine that make consistency easier.

You're not using a fitness app. You have a coach.

Here's what nobody's saying out loud: building an intelligent brand means confronting some hard truths about what you think you know about your customers.

Most brands ask: "What do our customers want?" Smart brands ask: "What are our customers trying to solve that they can't quite articulate?"

There's a massive difference.

A woman buying anti-ageing cream might not actually be worried about wrinkles. She might be processing anxiety about visibility in her career. About being taken seriously. About control in a life that feels increasingly chaotic.

If you're just solving for "reduce fine lines," you're missing the story.

Sephora discovered something counterintuitive: their most valuable customers often interact the least with customer service.

Why? Because they've already figured out the system. They know what works for them. They're confident.

Traditional metrics would miss these people entirely, they're not leaving reviews, not asking questions, not engaging in obvious ways.

But an intelligent system notices the pattern of their purchases, the consistency of their routine, the precision of their choices. These aren't just customers. They're advocates waiting to be activated.

Here's a real example: a luxury skincare brand saw customers frequently abandoning products with retinol in the cart.

The obvious read? "People don't want retinol." The intelligent read? "People are intimidated by retinol and don't know how to use it."

The solution wasn't removing retinol products. It was creating better education, gentler entry points, and community support around incorporating active ingredients.

Same data. Completely different strategy.

I need to be clear about something: intelligence without humanity is just creepy surveillance.

The brands getting this right aren't replacing humans, they're amplifying human capacity to care at scale.

Sephora's approach is brilliant: AI analyses thousands of products and skin types, identifying patterns no human could spot across that volume.

But the final recommendation? That's crafted by a beauty advisor who adds context, nuance, and that intangible thing called judgment.

The AI says "these products match your profile." The human says "but here's which one I'd actually start with, and why."

One is computation. The other is wisdom.

Some of the smartest brands are deliberately choosing not to use all the intelligence they have access to.

A wellness app could predict when you're about to quit your meditation practice with 87% accuracy. They could intervene, send notifications, and apply pressure.

But should they?
Leading brands are experimenting with "empathy gaps", moments where they choose not to act on what they know, giving customers space to figure things out themselves.

Because sometimes the most intelligent thing a brand can do is get out of the way.

Beauty brands are discovering that purchase behaviour alone tells an incomplete story.

A customer buying pregnancy-safe skincare might be excited, terrified, both, or neither. The data doesn't know. A thoughtful human does.

This is why the best intelligent brands build what I call "context layers", ways for customers to share not just what they're doing, but how they're feeling about it.

And they make that sharing optional, not mandatory. Because trust isn't built through extraction, it's built through invitation.

If you're a beauty or wellness founder thinking "this sounds expensive and complicated," I hear you. But here's the thing: becoming a smarter brand doesn't start with technology. It starts with curiosity.

Before you build anything, create systems to actually hear what customers are telling you. Not just surveys. Not just reviews.

One yoga studio started noticing students arriving early and lingering after class. They weren't there for extra practice, they were there for connection. That observation led to structured community programming that increased retention by 40%.

The intelligence wasn't in an algorithm. It was in paying attention.

Stop thinking in terms of awareness > consideration > purchase. Start thinking in terms of: What's the transformation our customer is trying to make?

A skincare customer isn't on a journey from "doesn't have our product" to "has our product." They're on a journey from "frustrated with their skin" to "confident in their skin."

Your product is a tool in that journey. But intelligence helps you support the whole arc, the setbacks, the questions, the moments they want to quit.

Most brands collect data and let it sit in dashboards nobody checks. Intelligent brands create living systems where insights immediately inform action.

Simple version:

Your email team notices customers who buy product A often return to buy product B within 30 days. They create an automated "here's what's next" touchpoint that increases repeat purchase by 15%.

Advanced version:

You notice customers who engage with specific content types have lower churn. You adjust your content calendar, double down on what's resonating, and watch retention improve across the board.

The intelligence isn't in having the data. It's in doing something with it fast enough that it matters.

This isn't a "nice to have." It's existential.
Every smart brand needs clear answers to:

The brands that thrive long-term aren't just intelligent. They're trustworthy.

And trust, once broken, is nearly impossible to rebuild.

We're heading toward something fascinating: brands that don't just understand individual customers, but understand the connections between customers.

Imagine:

We're moving from "I know you" to "we're in this together."

From individual intelligence to collective wisdom.

Here's what I keep coming back to:
Every brand is going to get smarter. The technology is here. The data exists. The tools are accessible.

But not every brand will become wiser.

Wisdom is intelligence applied with empathy. With restraint. With long-term thinking that prioritises relationships over transactions.

The brands that win won't just be the ones with the best algorithms.

They'll be the ones that use intelligence to actually improve people's lives, not just extract more value from them. They'll be the ones who see the whole person, not just the purchaser. They'll be the ones that remember: becoming smarter is only valuable if it helps you serve better.

What would your brand do differently if you truly understood what your customers needed before they asked for it?

Not to manipulate. Not to extract. But to serve.

That's the intelligence revolution I'm interested in.

Are you?