
Gen Alpha doesn't ask their mother what moisturiser to use. They ask the algorithm. This is the first generation where beauty literacy arrives before puberty, not through bathroom cabinet inheritance or department store sampling, but through an endless scroll of skincare routines, aesthetic codes, and creator-validated rituals.
In this article:
💛 The cultural movement: How beauty became default literacy for Gen Alpha
💛 The emotional driver: Why they're chasing legibility, not aspiration
💛 The long-term shift: What happens when beauty is a baseline expectation, not a discovery
Quick favour: This is Part 1 of a 3-part series on Gen Alpha and the future of beauty discovery. If this resonates, subscribe to follow the full conversation.
This is the first generation where beauty literacy arrives before puberty, not through bathroom cabinet inheritance or department store sampling, but through an endless scroll of skincare routines, aesthetic codes, and creator-validated rituals. Beauty is no longer a rite of passage. It's ambient knowledge, absorbed passively, reinforced constantly, and purchased independently before their skin even needs intervention.
The numbers tell one story: $4.7 billion in tween-influenced beauty spending, 203% stock climbs for youth-focused brands, a projected 160.7 million users in the baby and child skincare market by 2028. But the cultural shift tells another, one that should concern every founder building in beauty and wellness today.

The cultural movement: beauty as default literacy
Previous generations discovered beauty through aspiration, watching older sisters apply makeup, stealing samples from mothers' vanities, and experimenting behind closed doors. Gen Alpha discovers beauty through curation. The algorithm serves them skincare content before they've experienced a breakout. Before they understand what retinol does, they know it belongs in a routine. Before their skin barrier is compromised, they've learned the language of repair.
This is not education. This is acculturation.
Social media functions as both discovery engine and validation mechanism. TikTok doesn't just show them products; it teaches them that having a routine is the baseline. That "skin prep" is non-negotiable. That glass skin, dewy skin, barrier-healthy skin are aesthetic outcomes they should already be pursuing. The platform creates fluency before desire, turning beauty into a learned behaviour that feels innate.
Retailers are complicit in this shift. CVS and Walgreens have remodelled their beauty sections to meet younger eyes at shelf level. Brands like Rini are creating sheet masks for three-year-olds. Bubble and Gryt design "age-appropriate" products for eight-year-olds, as if childhood now requires segmented skincare solutions. The physical retail environment has become an extension of the feed, bright, accessible, and designed to make beauty feel like a natural next step, not a milestone.

The emotional driver: identity formation through aesthetic participation
What's actually happening beneath the surface is profound: Gen Alpha is using beauty products as identity tools before they have a stable sense of self.
For previous generations, beauty was tied to transformation, to becoming something. For Gen Alpha, beauty is tied to belonging. It's about participating in an aesthetic code, signalling fluency in a visual language, and proving they understand the culture they're inheriting. Skincare routines aren't about results. They're about ritual. They're about being the kind of person who has a routine.
This generation isn't chasing aspiration. They're chasing legibility. They want to be seen as someone who gets it, who fits, who speaks the lingua franca of self-care. The emotional driver isn't vanity or insecurity in the traditional sense; it's the need to perform competence in a culture where aesthetic literacy is the entry fee for social participation.
And because this performance begins so young, the stakes are different. Tweens aren't learning beauty to enhance themselves; they're learning beauty to construct themselves. The products they choose become building blocks of identity before that identity has any stable foundation.
The long-term shift: beauty as continuous participation, not milestone achievement
The long-term implication is this: Gen Alpha will never experience beauty as a discovery moment. They will only know it as a baseline expectation.
They will not remember their first lipstick or their first skincare purchase as pivotal. They will remember beauty as something that was always there, always accessible, always required. This fundamentally rewires the emotional relationship consumers will have with beauty brands for the next fifty years.
Future consumers will not seek transformation. They will seek refinement. They will not look for products that change them; they will look for products that optimise, maintain, and perfect the routines they've already internalised. Brand loyalty will not be built on aspiration or breakthrough moments. It will be built on consistency, trust, and alignment with the identity they've been curating since childhood.
This also means the traditional beauty marketing funnel is dead. Gen Alpha is not moving through awareness → consideration → purchase. They're moving through ambient exposure → algorithmic validation → impulse purchase → identity reinforcement. The product is almost secondary. The feeling of participating in a cultural movement is primary.
What this means for brands
If Gen Alpha is the first generation to absorb beauty as ambient literacy, then brands must fundamentally rethink how they show up in culture. The question is no longer "What does this product do?" The question is "What does using this product mean?"
This shift demands that beauty and wellness founders stop positioning themselves as solutions and start positioning themselves as cultural entry points. Your brand must be findable in the scroll, not through active searching. Your products must function as identity signals, not just functional solutions. And you must build for ritual and participation, not transformation and results.
But here's what most brands are getting wrong: they see Gen Alpha's behaviour and think the opportunity is in creating "age-appropriate" versions of adult products. They think if they can just make it gentler, cleaner, simpler, they'll capture this market.
They're optimising for the wrong variable entirely.
The gap between what brands think they're selling and what Gen Alpha is actually buying is wider than anyone realises. And that gap will determine which brands build generational loyalty and which ones become cautionary tales about exploiting developmental vulnerabilities.
This is Part 1 of a three-part series on Gen Alpha and the future of beauty discovery.
Part 1: The algorithmic childhood — How Gen Alpha is rewiring beauty discovery (you are here)
Part 2: The invisible gap — What brands think they're selling vs. what Gen Alpha is actually buying (next week)
Part 3: The strategic framework — How to build Gen Alpha trust without exploiting developmental vulnerabilities (coming soon)
This is the fourth signal in six months pointing to the same underlying shift: identity formation is moving out of private spaces and into algorithmically-curated public performance. Gen Alpha isn't an isolated trend. They're the leading edge of a cultural recalibration that will reshape how every generation relates to beauty, selfhood, and the brands that promise to help them become.
If you're a founder in beauty or wellness and want to explore how this applies to your brand specifically, or if you're seeing signals in your own category that don't yet have language, let's talk.

Hi, I’m Paula Ironside and I run Hunter & Florence, an AI-native creative studio in Oslo that helps beauty and wellness founders build story-driven brands through cultural intelligence.
This series is an example of that methodology in action: identifying the cultural movement, diagnosing the invisible gap, and translating that into strategic direction.
If you're building in beauty or wellness and want to explore what cultural shifts mean for your brand specifically, or if you're seeing gaps in your own positioning that don't yet have language, let's talk.
